Category: Sports Analysis

Austin FC vs FC Dallas arrives as a compact Texas rivalry check for Havmon’s sports-analysis calendar. The official MLS schedule lists the match at Q2 Stadium in Austin, TX, with kickoff at 2026-08-17T00:30:00 UTC.

This article uses public official MLS data only. The match is verified from the MLS schedule endpoint, and the scorer table uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat endpoint.

Match context

• League: Major League Soccer regular season
• Match: Austin FC vs FC Dallas
• Venue: Q2 Stadium, Austin, TX
• Verified kickoff: 2026-08-17T00:30:00 UTC

Why the central channel matters

Austin’s first task is to keep the central channel stable after losing the ball. FC Dallas have Petar Musa as a clear reference point, so the first defensive pass after an Austin turnover can decide whether Dallas attack into a set back line or into open space.

For FC Dallas, the useful detail is the spacing around Musa. If Logan Farrington or Samuel Sarver receive close enough to combine, Dallas can turn one central touch into a wide runner. If Austin’s midfield line stays compact, Dallas may need longer circulation before reaching the box.

One-year scoring-rate working table

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the verified official MLS 2026 regular-season sample. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS regular-season sample, not as a forecast.

Team	Player	Goals	Appearances	One-year scoring rate
Austin FC	Myrto Uzuni	6	16	37.5%
Austin FC	Christian Ramírez	5	16	31.2%
Austin FC	Jayden Nelson	2	11	18.2%
Austin FC	Jon Bell	2	14	14.3%
FC Dallas	Petar Musa	13	16	81.2%
FC Dallas	Logan Farrington	6	17	35.3%
FC Dallas	Samuel Sarver	3	11	27.3%
FC Dallas	Patrickson Delgado	3	15	20.0%

Reading the table safely

Petar Musa’s row gives Dallas the clearest finishing reference in this sample, while Myrto Uzuni and Christian Ramírez give Austin two different profiles for box entries. The table should not be read as a match forecast; it is a transparent scoring-frequency snapshot from the verified sample.

Havmon analysis angle

The key phase is Austin’s rest defense behind the first attack. If Austin protect the central lane, the match can become a second-ball contest. If Dallas receive cleanly between the lines, Musa’s movement can pull Austin’s center backs into early decisions.

Sources

• Official MLS schedule endpoint
• Official MLS player statistics endpoint

Data period: Official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample through Matchday 19; fixture verified for 2026-08-17T00:30:00 UTC.

Nashville SC vs Inter Miami CF is scheduled for 2026-08-16 00:30 UTC (2026-08-16 09:30 KST) at GEODIS Park. The official MLS schedule lists this as MLS Regular Season 2026, match ID MLS-MAT-0009IT.

This Havmon note keeps the pre-match angle simple: Zone-14 control. Nashville can make the central lane crowded, while Inter Miami can still create clean receiving windows if the first pass into the attacking midfielder is protected by close support. The useful question is not a result call; it is which team can keep the area in front of the box connected after the first pressure line is broken.

Scoring-rate sample and limits

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS regular-season sample, not as a forecast.

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Team	Player	Appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate
Inter Miami CF	Leo Messi	15	12	80.0%
Nashville SC	Sam Surridge	12	11	91.7%
Inter Miami CF	Luis Suárez	14	10	71.4%
Inter Miami CF	Germán Berterame	17	7	41.2%
Nashville SC	Hany Mukhtar	18	6	33.3%
Nashville SC	Warren Madrigal	15	5	33.3%
Inter Miami CF	Rodrigo De Paul	14	4	28.6%
Nashville SC	Abdul Shakur Mohammed	8	3	37.5%
Inter Miami CF	Mateo Silvetti	13	3	23.1%
Nashville SC	Cristian Espinoza	14	3	21.4%

What the table says for the match shape

• Nashville’s central forwards give the home side a direct reference point if the ball reaches Zone 14 early.
• Inter Miami’s main scorers reward short combinations around the box, so spacing behind the first runner matters as much as the final touch.
• The cleaner side in transition may be the side that protects the second ball after a blocked shot or loose cross.

AdSense-safe source notes

Fixture source: official MLS schedule API. Player sample source: official MLS player-stat endpoint for Major League Soccer regular season 2026. This article uses no news images and does not present the scoring-rate table as a prediction.

Official MLS schedule data · Official MLS player-stat data

Los Angeles Football Club vs Club Querétaro is listed on the official MLS Leagues Cup schedule for 2026-08-13 02:30:00 UTC at BMO Stadium. This Havmon preview focuses on Son Heung-Min service lanes and recent scoring frequency, using only verified public-source data.

Match context

• Competition: Leagues Cup 2026
• Fixture: Los Angeles Football Club vs Club Querétaro
• Kickoff: 2026-08-13 02:30:00 UTC
• Venue: BMO Stadium
• Official source: MLS schedule endpoint, match ID MLS-MAT-000A4A

Tactical focus: Son Heung-Min service lanes

The safest pre-match angle is not a result forecast. It is how LAFC can keep Son Heung-Min connected between the centre-forward lane and the left half-space while still protecting counter-pressing positions after attacks break down.

For LAFC-style possession phases, the key question is whether the nearest midfielders stay close enough to recover loose balls while the front line attacks early service. If the first pass into the forward line is delayed, the match can become more about second balls and rest-defense spacing than isolated finishing moments.

One-year scoring rate table

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for Los Angeles Football Club. A comparable Club Querétaro scorer table is not added because the same official MLS public source did not provide a verified 2026 season sample for Club Querétaro in this automated check. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS sample, not as a forecast.

Team	Player	Appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate
Los Angeles Football Club	Denis Bouanga	18	10	55.6%
Los Angeles Football Club	David Martínez	18	6	33.3%
Los Angeles Football Club	Son Heung-Min	17	4	23.5%
Los Angeles Football Club	Nathan Ordaz	9	2	22.2%
Los Angeles Football Club	Mark Delgado	18	2	11.1%
Los Angeles Football Club	Mathieu Choinière	19	2	10.5%
Los Angeles Football Club	Jude Terry	8	1	12.5%
Los Angeles Football Club	Sergi Palencia	9	1	11.1%
Los Angeles Football Club	Stephen Eustáquio	10	1	10.0%
Los Angeles Football Club	Ryan Hollingshead	15	1	6.7%

How to read the table safely

The table is a descriptive scoring-frequency snapshot from the verified MLS sample. It should be used to understand who has recently converted chances within this public dataset, alongside tactical context such as service lanes, pressing cover and substitution timing.

Source notes

• Fixture verification: official MLS Leagues Cup schedule endpoint.
• Scoring-rate sample: official MLS 2026 regular-season player statistics endpoint.
• No news photographs or third-party editorial images were used.

Transition rest defense can shape Club América vs Austin FC before kickoff. The official MLS schedule lists Club América vs Austin FC for Leagues Cup 2026 at Q2 Stadium, with planned kickoff at 2026-08-14T00:30:00Z. This Havmon preview keeps the match frame source-labeled and focuses on how Austin’s rest defense must manage Club América’s transition threat after wide attacks.

Match context from the official schedule

• Competition: Leagues Cup 2026
• Match: Club América vs Austin FC
• Venue: Q2 Stadium
• Planned kickoff: 2026-08-14T00:30:00Z UTC
• Public sources used: official MLS schedule endpoint and official MLS player-stat endpoint

Tactical angle: rest defense after wide attacks

Austin’s safest attacking periods should come when the wide player receives with support underneath and a central cover line already in place. If the far-side midfielder jumps too early, Club América can attack the first open lane after a clearance or interception. If Austin keep the second line compact, the first pass after loss becomes harder and the match can stay in controlled territory.

That balance matters because Leagues Cup games often change rhythm quickly when one side overcommits around the box. Austin do not need every wide action to end with an immediate shot; they need the service, rebound position and counter-pressure to work as one sequence. For an AdSense-safe analysis page, the scoring table below is used only as a verified recent scoring-frequency reference, not as a forecast.

One-year scoring rate table

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for Austin FC. A comparable Club América scorer table is not added because the same official MLS public source did not provide a verified 2026 season sample for Club América in this automated check. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS sample, not as a forecast.

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Player	Verified sample	Appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate
Myrto Uzuni	Official MLS 2026 regular season	16	6	37.5%
Christian Ramírez	Official MLS 2026 regular season	16	5	31.2%
Jayden Nelson	Official MLS 2026 regular season	11	2	18.2%
Jon Bell	Official MLS 2026 regular season	14	2	14.3%
Mikkel Desler	Official MLS 2026 regular season	9	1	11.1%
Brendan Hines-Ike	Official MLS 2026 regular season	14	1	7.1%
Ilie Sánchez	Official MLS 2026 regular season	15	1	6.7%
Guilherme Biro	Official MLS 2026 regular season	15	1	6.7%

How to read the numbers

Myrto Uzuni and Christian Ramírez lead Austin’s verified scoring sample, giving the attack two different reference points: one for movement into finishing lanes and one for penalty-box occupation. Jayden Nelson and Jon Bell add secondary production, while Facundo Torres can influence the final-third rhythm even when the scoring sample is modest. The figures should be paired with the confirmed lineup and live match state once available.

Pre-kickoff checklist

• Can Austin attack wide areas without leaving the central lane open behind the ball?
• Does the nearest midfielder stay close enough to secure second balls?
• Can Club América turn Austin’s incomplete crosses into fast vertical attacks?
• Do substitutions change Austin’s box presence or counter-pressure shape?

This article uses no news photographs and does not present the numbers as a result claim. It is a source-labeled tactical preview built around official fixture data and a clearly limited scoring-frequency table.

Fixture verified from the official MLS public schedule: Inter Miami CF vs Club León, Leagues Cup group stage, planned kickoff 2026-08-12 23:30 UTC / 2026-08-13 08:30 KST at Nu Stadium.

Why the service zones matter

Inter Miami’s clearest attacking question is not only who finishes the move, but where the first clean service reaches Lionel Messi. Against Club León, Miami can protect the ball by moving the first pass into the right half-space, then using Luis Suárez as the central reference to hold the defensive line.

If Rodrigo De Paul or Telasco Segovia receives the second ball facing forward, Miami can create a cleaner rhythm around Messi without turning the match into a constant transition exchange. The safer tactical reading is therefore about service lanes, support distances, and how quickly Miami can reset after a lost pass.

One-year scoring rate table

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for Inter Miami players. A comparable Club León scorer table is not added because the same official MLS public source did not provide a verified 2026 season sample for Club León in this check. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS sample, not as a forecast.

Player	Verified sample	Appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate
Leo Messi	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	15	12	80.0%
Luis Suárez	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	14	10	71.4%
Germán Berterame	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	17	7	41.2%
Rodrigo De Paul	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	14	4	28.6%
Mateo Silvetti	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	13	3	23.1%
Telasco Segovia	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	16	2	12.5%
Preston Plambeck	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	6	1	16.7%
Sergio Reguilón	Official MLS 2026 regular season, Miami	8	1	12.5%

How to read the numbers

Messi and Suárez remain the highest-frequency finishers in the verified Miami sample, but the tactical trigger is the delivery path. A stable right-side connection can reduce rushed shots, while a stretched game would put more pressure on Miami’s rest defense behind the first attacking wave.

Source notes

• Official MLS schedule API: fixture listing
• Official MLS player statistics API: MLS 2026 regular-season player sample

Match frame: Official MLS data lists Toluca FC vs Los Angeles Football Club in Leagues Cup 2026, with LAFC winning 0:1 after a late Eddie Segura goal at 90+1. Son Heung-Min was listed by the official feed as LAFC’s central forward in a 4-3-3 team shape.

Why the central role mattered

LAFC’s late goal came from a match state where the central lane still had to hold Toluca’s back line while wide runners and second-ball pressure stayed active. The official event feed credits Eddie Segura and lists Jacob Shaffelburg as the assist provider, so the post-match reading is less about volume and more about how LAFC kept enough structure for one late box action.

One-year scoring rate table

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for LAFC players listed in the official match squad. A comparable Toluca scorer table is not added because the same official MLS public source did not provide a verified 2026 season sample for Toluca in this automated check. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS sample, not as a forecast.

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Player	Official squad status	MLS regular-season appearances	MLS regular-season goals	One-year scoring rate
Denis Bouanga	Starter	18	10	55.6%
David Martínez	Starter	18	6	33.3%
Son Heung-Min	Starter	17	4	23.5%
Mark Delgado	Starter	18	2	11.1%
Mathieu Choinière	Starter	19	2	10.5%
Jude Terry	Squad option	8	1	12.5%
Ryan Hollingshead	Starter	15	1	6.7%
Timothy Tillman	Starter	16	1	6.2%
Eddie Segura	Squad option	17	0	0.0%

Post-match notes for readers

• Son Heung-Min: His listed central-forward role is the key search and tactical angle because it shaped LAFC’s central reference point even when the winning action came from a defender.
• Denis Bouanga and David Martínez: Their regular-season scoring rates give context to LAFC’s usual attacking load, without turning the table into a forecast.
• Eddie Segura: The match winner is included to separate this Leagues Cup goal from the regular-season scoring sample.

Verified sources

• Official MLS match detail API: Toluca FC vs LAFC match detail
• Official MLS key events API: Toluca FC vs LAFC key events
• Official MLS player statistics API: MLS 2026 regular-season player statistics

Club América vs Portland Timbers gives Havmon a clean pre-match analysis angle because the fixture is verified in the official MLS schedule feed for Leagues Cup 2026. The listed kickoff is 2026-08-10T02:15:00Z at Providence Park in Portland, OR.

Verified match context

• Competition: Leagues Cup 2026
• Match: Club América vs Portland Timbers
• Official status: scheduled
• Venue: Providence Park

Wide-lane control before kickoff

Portland’s safest route into the match is not only direct service into the box. The more stable question is whether the Timbers can keep their wide lanes connected after the first pass out of pressure. If the fullback and near-side midfielder separate too early, Club América can turn recoveries into immediate diagonal attacks. If Portland keeps the second ball close, the home-side spacing can reduce long defensive runs and create cleaner crossing windows.

For Club América, the key pressure point is the first backward pass after Portland enters the flank. A compact reaction there can stop Portland from resetting through the middle. The tactical read is therefore about lane control, rest defense, and second-ball spacing, not a result forecast.

One-year scoring rate table

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check. The table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for Portland Timbers. Club América rows are not included because a comparable official public sample in the same format was not available during this run. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS regular-season sample, not as a forecast.

Player	Appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate
Kevin Kelsy	17	9	52.9%
Kristoffer Velde	17	4	23.5%
Felipe Mora	13	4	30.8%
Cole Bassett	14	3	21.4%
Ariel Lassiter	13	2	15.4%
Antony Alves Santos	17	2	11.8%

How to read the numbers

Kevin Kelsy’s rate highlights why Portland can stay dangerous even if possession is uneven. Felipe Mora and Kristoffer Velde add different finishing profiles, while Cole Bassett gives the Timbers a midfield arrival option. The table should be used as context for who has converted chances in the verified sample, alongside the match-state and spacing notes above.

Sources checked

• Official MLS schedule API: Leagues Cup fixture verification
• Official MLS player statistics API: 2026 regular-season sample

New England Revolution vs Houston Dynamo FC is today’s single Havmon MLS topic because it avoids repeating the recent LAFC, Inter Miami, San Diego and Club América match angles while keeping a strong official data trail. The safer question before kickoff is not a future result claim. It is whether New England can protect rest-defense positions after attacks, and whether Houston can turn recoveries into clean second-phase entries.

This article uses public football data, tactical roles and a verified one-year scoring rate table. The table is designed as recent scoring frequency, not as a forecast, and the sample limits are stated clearly.

Match snapshot

• League: Major League Soccer – Regular Season
• Match: New England Revolution vs Houston Dynamo FC
• Status at check: scheduled
• Kickoff: 2026-08-08T20:30:00Z UTC
• Primary fixture source: official MLS schedule API
• Reference stats page: official MLS player stats page

Why rest defense is the useful angle

New England often need the first pass after losing the ball to be delayed. If the fullback zone or weak-side midfielder is too high, Houston can attack the space before the Revolution back line resets. That makes the first five seconds after a turnover the clearest tactical lens for this match.

Houston’s recent scoring rows show why that matters. Guilherme Santos gives a direct channel reference, while Jack McGlynn and Mateusz Bogusz can arrive from midfield zones. New England’s table is also spread across roles: Carles Gil can connect attacks, Dor Turgeman and Leo Campana give central presence, and Luca Langoni or Peyton Miller can stretch the width.

The matchup is therefore less about naming one scorer and more about structure. If New England keep enough players behind the ball, Houston may need longer possessions. If Houston win the first rebound or the first loose pass, the same areas can become transition lanes.

One-year scoring rate table

The formula is one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100. The checked period is 2025-08-08 to 2026-08-08 UTC. Appearances are counted from official MLS regular-season lineups plus substitution-in events. Havmon counted 54 completed team-match records from the verified public MLS sample.

Player	Team	Goals	Appearances	One-year scoring rate	Context note
Carles Gil	New England Revolution	9	27	33.3%	New England Revolution midfield runner or wide support option
Dor Turgeman	New England Revolution	7	20	35.0%	New England Revolution forward or channel runner in the verified sample
Peyton Miller	New England Revolution	5	22	22.7%	New England Revolution forward or channel runner in the verified sample
Luca Langoni	New England Revolution	4	25	16.0%	New England Revolution forward or channel runner in the verified sample
Leo Campana	New England Revolution	4	9	44.4%	New England Revolution forward or channel runner in the verified sample
Guilherme Santos	Houston Dynamo FC	10	17	58.8%	Houston Dynamo FC forward or channel runner in the verified sample
Jack McGlynn	Houston Dynamo FC	5	20	25.0%	Houston Dynamo FC midfield runner or wide support option
Mateusz Bogusz	Houston Dynamo FC	4	16	25.0%	Houston Dynamo FC central connector with late-arrival value
Lawrence Ennali	Houston Dynamo FC	3	27	11.1%	Houston Dynamo FC defensive player with set-piece scoring context
Ezequiel Ponce	Houston Dynamo FC	3	26	11.5%	Houston Dynamo FC forward or channel runner in the verified sample

Read the rate as recent scoring frequency inside this public sample, not as a forecast. The table does not include cup matches, national-team matches, friendlies or non-MLS club data, and smaller samples can move quickly after one goal.

What the table says about New England

Carles Gil’s row matters because he can turn a slow possession into a cleaner final pass. Turgeman and Campana add central reference points, while Langoni and Miller help explain why the outside channels should not be ignored. For New England, the key is balance: attack with enough numbers to support the box, but not so many that Houston receive the first forward pass with open grass.

That balance also affects second balls. If New England keep the nearest midfielder close to the loss of possession, they can recycle attacks without turning the match into a long-distance running contest. If that support is late, Houston’s runners become harder to control.

Where Houston can change the rhythm

Houston’s path is direct but not simple. Santos gives depth, McGlynn can help the next pass arrive earlier, and Bogusz or Herrera can connect the second phase. The useful detail is timing: Houston do not need every attack to be fast, but they do need the first outlet after recovery to be clean enough to move New England’s block backward.

If the Dynamo force New England’s creators to receive under pressure, they can reduce the quality of the next pass and protect their own back line. If they allow Gil and the wide runners to turn freely, the match can become a sequence of repeat entries around the box.

Bottom line

New England Revolution vs Houston Dynamo FC is a safe Havmon topic because it combines a near-term MLS regular-season fixture, official public data and a limited scoring-rate method. Rest defense is the main lens: New England need protection behind attacks, while Houston need clean outlets after recoveries.

This is general sports analysis based on public match data. It does not promise any future result and does not ask readers to act on match outcomes.

For broader context on reading team shape, see Havmon’s guide: how to read a football lineup before a big match.

Club América vs San Diego FC arrives as a Leagues Cup 2026 Phase One match with kickoff listed by the official MLS data feed at 2026-08-07T02:00:00Z and venue listed as Estadio Banorte. This note focuses on shape, first pressure, and recent scoring frequency rather than outcome claims.

Official setup checked before kickoff

Club América are listed in a 4-2-3-1, while San Diego FC are listed in a 5-3-2 with 6. That contrast creates a clear tactical question: can América move the ball through the first line quickly enough to pull San Diego’s back five apart, or can San Diego keep two forwards connected to the midfield screen and turn the first clearance into a controlled release?

For América, the official XI includes Brian Rodríguez (CAM), Henry Martin (CF), Isaías Violante (RAM), Ícaro da Conceição (LAM). For San Diego, the official XI includes Lewis Morgan (LS), Gabriel Pirani (HRM), Anders Dreyer (RS), Onni Valakari (HLM). The match therefore starts with América carrying more natural attacking midfield width and San Diego holding a compact two-forward release.

Where the pressure can matter

The safer reading is not to chase a score call. The important early detail is the space behind América’s advanced wide players. If San Diego’s wing backs stay deep, América can keep the ball in front of them but may need repeated switches to open the box. If San Diego’s first two runners, especially Lewis Morgan and Anders Dreyer, receive clean outlets, the game can become more transitional even without a long spell of possession.

Set pieces also deserve attention because San Diego’s five-player defensive line can protect the box, yet repeated corners or second balls may keep América’s attacking midfielders close to goal. That is why the scoring-rate table below is used only as a recent finishing-frequency reference for players in the verified San Diego squad.

One-year scoring rate table

Formula: one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for San Diego FC players listed in the official match squad. A comparable Club América scorer table is not added because the same official MLS public source did not provide a verified 2026 season sample for Club América in this automated check. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS sample, not as a forecast.

Player	Match-squad status	Listed role	Appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate
Marcus Ingvartsen	Squad option	—	18	11	61.1%
Anders Dreyer	Starter	RS	18	7	38.9%
David Vazquez	Squad option	—	16	3	18.8%
Onni Valakari	Starter	HLM	18	3	16.7%
Bryan Zamblé	Squad option	—	8	2	25.0%
Alejandro Alvarado	Squad option	—	9	1	11.1%
Luca Bombino	Starter	LB	14	1	7.1%
Christopher McVey	Starter	CB	16	1	6.2%

AdSense-safe takeaway

The useful pre-match angle is structural: América’s 4-2-3-1 has enough support around Henry Martin to press the first pass after losses, while San Diego’s 5-3-2 with 6 gives Dreyer, Morgan, and the midfield line a direct escape route. The table gives a verified recent scoring frequency for San Diego players in the official squad, but it should be read beside formation and role, not alone.

Sources checked

• Official MLS match detail feed: MLS-MAT-000A3G
• Official MLS schedule feed for Leagues Cup 2026: fixture list
• Official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat feed: player statistics

LAFC vs Chivas starting-XI spacing is the safest pre-match angle for this Leagues Cup meeting because the official MLS data feed already lists the fixture, venue, match status and starting elevens. The match is recorded as Los Angeles Football Club vs Chivas de Guadalajara, match ID MLS-MAT-000A3B, at BMO Stadium, with planned kickoff at 2026-08-06T02:30:00Z. The official status at the automated check was scheduled.

Why the starting shape matters

LAFC’s listed front line puts Denis Bouanga on the left, Son Heung-Min through the center and David Martínez on the right. That gives LAFC three different receiving patterns: Bouanga can hold width before attacking the box, Son can pin the center backs with curved runs, and Martínez can stretch the weak side when Chivas shift across.

Chivas’ official starting group includes Efraín Álvarez, Roberto Alvarado and Armando González, which makes the first defensive transition important for LAFC. If LAFC lose the ball with both fullbacks high, the first midfield delay from Mathieu Choinière, Mark Delgado and Timothy Tillman becomes the key protection layer.

Verified starting elevens from the official match detail

LAFC starters: CM Mathieu Choinière, LCB Nkosi Tafari, HRM Mark Delgado, RB Ryan Hollingshead, LW Denis Bouanga, GK Thomas Hasal, HLM Timothy Tillman, LB Yevhen Cheberko, RW David Martínez, CF Son Heung-Min, RCB Ryan Porteous

Chivas starters: HLM Efraín Álvarez, RCB Daniel Aguirre, RM Richard Ledezma, RS Roberto Alvarado, CDM Fernando González, GK Raúl Rangel, CB Luis Romo, HRM Omar Govea, LCB José Castillo, LM Bryan González, LS Armando González

One-year scoring rate table

Exact all-competition data for the last 365 days was not available from one complete public source for this automated check, so the table below uses the official MLS 2026 regular-season player-stat sample for LAFC players listed in the match squad. A comparable Chivas scorer table is not added because the same official MLS public source did not provide a verified 2026 season sample for Chivas in this automated check. Read this as recent scoring frequency in the verified MLS sample, not as a forecast.

Player	Team	Sample appearances	Goals	One-year scoring rate	Verified sample
Denis Bouanga	LAFC	18	10	55.6%	Official MLS 2026 regular season
David Martínez	LAFC	18	6	33.3%	Official MLS 2026 regular season
Son Heung-Min	LAFC	17	4	23.5%	Official MLS 2026 regular season
Mathieu Choinière	LAFC	19	2	10.5%	Official MLS 2026 regular season
Mark Delgado	LAFC	18	2	11.1%	Official MLS 2026 regular season
Timothy Tillman	LAFC	16	1	6.2%	Official MLS 2026 regular season

How to read the table

The rate is a scoring-frequency indicator inside the verified public sample. Bouanga’s 10 goals in 18 appearances show why Chivas need immediate pressure on LAFC’s left channel. Martínez’s and Son’s rows point to a second route: if Chivas collapse toward Bouanga, LAFC can still attack the central lane and the far-side run.

The limitation is important for AdSense-safe analysis: this article does not invent Chivas scoring numbers from an incomplete source. It uses the verified LAFC sample, the official starting XI and tactical context that can be checked from public MLS data.

Sources and method

• Fixture source: official MLS stats schedule and match detail for MLS-MAT-000A3B (2026-08-06T02:30:00Z, BMO Stadium).
• Scoring-rate source: official MLS 2026 regular-season player statistics endpoint, with one-year scoring rate = goals / appearances × 100.

No news photos or third-party images were used. The article is written as sports analysis and does not request clicks on ads or present the scoring-rate table as a result guarantee.